The son, who rented a room in his father’s previous house and is now in conflict with the new owner, has no right to the room. The court decided so. In a recent summary proceeding, the son and the new owner faced off against each other in court, where the case revolved around access to a room in the house that belonged to the son’s father.
The building on Max Ernststraat was sold due to mortgage arrears. However, the new owner refused to let the son into the room, because he was not aware of the rental agreement. The son claimed that the new owner was already aware of this, and therefore demanded compensation of approximately 25 thousand euros in advance.
This amount consists of material damages amounting to 19,940 euros. He also demanded 5,000 euros for psychological complaints and other accommodation costs.
‘Unlikely’
However, the court ruled that there could not be a lease between the son and the father. Therefore, the request to access the room was denied. Furthermore, the court held that there was no urgent interest in the advance payment for damages. The claim for damages was rejected because it was not supported by sufficient evidence.
“Coffee buff. Twitter fanatic. Tv practitioner. Social media advocate. Pop culture ninja.”
More Stories
Discovery of a giant volcano on Mars
“Plant only organic flower bulbs in public places.”
You have to try Limoncello jelly shots this summer