Cheraw Chronicle

Complete News World

Chief Tesla Autopilot: Musk’s Claims About Autopilot Advances Are Unrealistic – Sound and Vision – News

Tesla’s chief of Autopilot Software told the California Highway Division that Elon Musk’s assertion that Tesla will achieve a self-driving L5 by the end of the year “does not match the reality of engineering.”

PlainSite, a legal nonprofit organization, requested it Minutes of conversation, Which occurred on March 9, between California Department of Motor Vehicles And Tesla via wob request. The phrase “Elon’s tweet does not correspond to the reality of technology,” has been removed, but can be read simply by pasting a copy into another document.

The judgment came in response to a request to “respond from an engineering perspective to Elon messages about L5 capability by the end of the year.” So it is not entirely clear what statements Musk is referring to. According to the record Is it about one Twittergesprek Between comma_ai and Musk at the last turn of the year. In it, Musk said: “Tesla Full Self-Driving will be operating at a much higher level of safety than the average driver this year, and I have complete confidence in that.”

Moore goes on to say that the Teslas currently have a Tier II autonomy. To reach even greater heights, cars must be able to travel from one to two million miles per driver for every intervention a driver has to make. They don’t report how much distance is now covered for each action. Musk had extrapolated the current upward trend in autopilot development to get to his point.

The point seems to be that Elon Musk isn’t specifically talking about the autonomy of the L5, but about “a level of safety compared to the average driver”. A tweet from Comma Musk responds to talking about the L5 self-driving. Tesla’s foreman did not respond to the comma betting call.

See also  “Arm is laying off 15 percent of employees after failed acquisition of Nvidia” - IT Pro - News

Level 5 autonomy in self-driving cars is the highest. In this, the human driver does not have to serve as a potential return point for vehicle steering. The vehicle must be able to carry itself everywhere and under all conditions, within reasonable limits.