After public appearances, scientists are increasingly facing fierce backlash and threats, not only from know-it-all anonymous people on social media, but also from their colleagues. This not only hurts them personally, but also undermines social debate and our democratic values, says Ennick Slaughter, president of the Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). devotion.
According to Sluiter, there are many scientists who decided not to go to this talk show, and kept their opinion to themselves due to intimidation.
The KNAW chief is tough on this: “It’s bad for these researchers, because their social integrity is affected as they want to contribute to debates on important social issues. But the debate itself and democratic values are affected as well, especially if scholars withdraw or engage in self-censorship. And we see that happening. Now, as you say in newspaper.
ScienceGuide, a news website about science and higher education, recently launched a survey on the issue, and has received several hundred responses from scientists. Half of them say they have had to deal with the scary reactions after going public. The vast majority of these scholars say they have become more cautious in the public sphere, and as a result they have become more fearful.
What was surprising in this survey was that the intimidation did not always come from (anonymous) messages on social media, but also from colleagues, students and even managers in their own scientific institution.
View all videos in the “What does the science say?” section.
Unlimited free access to Showbytes? And that can!
Sign in or create an account and never miss a thing from the stars.
“Coffee buff. Twitter fanatic. Tv practitioner. Social media advocate. Pop culture ninja.”
More Stories
In the German border area with Groningen and Drenthe, much more space is provided for wind turbines
Utrecht PAS correspondents are given priority at the Nitrogen Bank
Adima responds to farmers’ letters: “The exception has not been waived” | agraf.nl